No handoff was written before the AI session failed
The cleanest workflow is to write a handoff before the session dies. The painful workflow is the real one: you forget, the model gets blocked, and now you need to recover anyway.
Why this hurts.
Proactive memory tools work when the habit holds. The missed-update window is where the task becomes expensive.
How ShardStitch solves it.
Inspect the working tree first
Start with disk truth: diff, files, commits, notes, and project memory.
Collect completed and pending checks
Collect the latest test outputs and identify checks that passed, failed, or have not run; do not infer success from changed files.
Mark chat-only context honestly
Label inferred next steps so the next agent does not treat guesses as facts.
Write the next action, not a transcript
Write one next action with a verifiable result so the next AI can continue without replaying the whole transcript.
What the next AI receives.
- What changed
- What is still recoverable
- What must be inferred
- What to verify first
What stays out.
- Pretending missing reasoning is certain
- Overconfident summaries
- Unverified claims
- Stale memory
Rebuild a handoff from surviving evidence
FAQ.
Can I recover work if I never wrote a handoff?
Some state may survive in saved files, Git history, logs, and notes. Unsaved edits and context stored only in the lost conversation may not; inspect each source rather than assuming complete recovery.
What should I do before generating a new handoff?
Confirm the active project and branch, inspect the diff, and identify the last command with a real result. Treat everything else as pending or unknown.
Related pages.
When no notes survived.
Inventory the branch, modified and untracked files, recent commits, and saved terminal output using read-only checks. Preserve unsaved editor buffers separately before restarting. A changed file proves an edit exists, not why it was chosen; decisions and rejected approaches that lived only in the lost conversation may remain unknown.